Your chance to give an honest op..

Brief：
I hope this works!http://s211.photobucket.com/albums/bb198...http://s211.photobucket.com/albums/bb198...I hope that those links work, if they do pleas.. 

I hope this works!

http://s211.photobucket.com/albums/bb198...

http://s211.photobucket.com/albums/bb198...

I hope that those links work, if they do please feel free to give really honest opinions about the positives and negatives for each one, All feed back appreciated

That is quite a cross. Both are beautiful in color, and have very pleasing faces that are proportional and a nice eye. However, both seem to have short necks which could be the Fjord in them, although the filly seems to have a bit more of a crest in her neck than the colt. The colt seem's to have a nice strong loin, but his topline and bottom line are not balanced.

The filly has a nice low headset with a shallow mouth which normally means that she will give easier to bit pressure. From the picture's it looks like she has nice straight legs. And both equine's have nice flat backs which will make stopping at higher speeds smoother.

They both look top heavy which appearance is given mainly because of the short thick neck, the filly's neck ties better into her shoulder's. The colt's head looks like it goes from chin to chest which will make speed events and jumping and dressage hard to do. You will probably be able to get better vertical flexion from the filly and she looks like she could make a good lower level dressage horse. Overall, I prefer the filly to the colt- her body ties better together and her face is very feminine and petite. Those horses are both very pretty. I would kill to have one of those in the hunter ring to get noticed! I think they are really pretty & a good cross. Some of my favorite colors! Wow - they're both lovely!